To kick things off, I began this with the intention of getting information from folks about their corrupt courts, judges and officials sent to my email...not commented below the last article, as most decided to do. That email AGAIN is:
americasdeadlysins@gmail.com
Please, if you will, MAKE A NOTE OF IT!!
After this portion, I highly suggest you make your way down to the asterisk line, where you will find information that will change your life, bet on it. For those of you that are already victims of judicial fraud, well, you've already experienced your fair share, and will validate it with this. This is primarily aimed at those who are still walking around asleep. You there! Yes YOU!! Yeah, I'm talking to YOU!!! Wake up, before you're the next contestant on "The Price Is Your Rights!"
I believe that I will kick things off, where this is concerned, by submitting the folks that I know need submitting...along with all I know of them. I suggest, highly, that you use this as a template to do your own lists; of which, after checking my email, I have...none!!! Not one list! I imagine this is due to your not knowing exactly what I want from you, and how to do it...well, that roadblock no longer exists, thanks to what I'm doing RIGHT NOW! SO GO CRAZY!!
Let's do this then, eh?
THE JUDGES
THE JUDGES
For Polk County, Iowa, home of Des Moines, Iowa, the State capitol, and my former home of 42 years, District 5C, The Judges List:
 |
| Judge William A. Price |
Judge William A. Price (The A, of course, stands for MAJOR ASSHOLE!) This man has an enemies list Omar Khadafi would envy. I once....ONCE, saw this man walking to get some coffee during a break of his...SHIFT? as a judge, and, I kid you not, the man looked over his shoulder at LEAST ten times, in just a block of walking. That's the life for me! I wanna be a corrupt evil judge!
Neither here nor there, this is, actually, a man I should be thanking...well, had he not upheld the legal kidnapping of my wife's only daughter; told an associate magistrate "Get him! He's a piece of cake" before I was tried by her for harassing a poor editor of a local rag to do my story after he sent me a SIGNED email stating he would; placed a cash only bond of $1500 on me for 3 simple misdemeanors once, and not only refused to recuse (dismiss, in legalese) himself from all of my cases when I ordered him to, but also refused me my right to have a recusal haring to determine his bias against me. Yes, you heard that right...the judge that I needed to dismiss himself from ruling over me was able to deny me the right to have a hearing to determine whether he was able to rule on a case involving me due to possible bias. No, no, our system isn't broken! The reason I should be thanking him, is for kicking me in the shins as to the condition of our judiciary; and the fleecing through the court system of the American people by these foreign officials; through the use of the law of the sea (commerce) and martial law courts. Had he not been the most corrupt judge I've come across to date, I would not know what I know now, that our judiciary is in bad need of a total dismemberment.
I'm just going to put it like this, people, this guy has no listed properties in Iowa, I have NEVER seen this guy in public, aside from his one trip to get some coffee, and it took me almost two years to find a single picture of him anywhere. I would hope that would be enough for you, to convince you not to vote him BACK in for yet another of a hundred terms; but in case it isn't, and you need more, well, here you go:
(Takes a deeeeeeep breath)...I was going to list links for every single article that has this judge's name in it; but that would be wayyyy too much work. For anyone wanting actual proof and paperwork concerning these allegations, go to the brownish looking sidebar of this blog. There, under the archives portion of that sidebar, click on any week of the first year, 2014, anytime after 6/22, and just about every single article has his name in it somewhere; and usually includes some accompanying paperwork. This carries on into 2015, until around May, then he resurfaces again in January, February and March of 2016, and briefly again in August and September of 2016. Will you have to go that far? Probably not. Believe me, once you've gone through just a couple of my 2014 articles, it should be more than enough to convince the majority of you folks that the only good places for this judge are jail or the grave.
 |
| Judge Robert Blink |
Now, this guy has his job as a judge down. Unlike Judge William Price, who is so corrupt that he doesn't even try to hide that fact anymore; to the public, and to those who don't know him yet, or haven't appeared in front of him, this guy initially projects like a fair, decent guy...but a fair and decent guy wouldn't dismiss 200+ pieces of evidence relevant to my defense in a felony trial, and, not only let all of his buddies, the 29 elected officials he dismissed as having to testify for my side of the case, get out of testifying, but went through my witness list a couple more times to ensure that even more could get out of testifying, even though they nor their lawyers were present at the hearing to quash those subpoenas. More than that, even after setting a hearing to have my probation revoked (I opted for this, and asked him to set a hearing for it...and he did), then issued a warrant for my arrest for...probation violation, even though I hadn't even signed up for probation, nor met with an officer of the court. This is also the guy who put me in jail for a year for a justified crime, refused, after promising he would, to issue a protective order involving a key witness who was half responsible for having me arrested and jailed, and threatened harassment charges against me for wanting to discuss possible ways to pay my debt to society, without jail, with the prosecuting attorney, Linda Lane.
For more about this Judge and what he did to me in my felony case, see these links:
and then stay tuned, very soon, for the transcripts from this case that were submitted as evidence in my post-conviction relief case concerning this case, where I am trying to get these wrongs righted...not that they will be. See also all of my post-conviction relief case submissions here in my most recent blog posts, around the last two links listed above.
 |
| Carol S. Egly |
There's a rather special place in the "Bruce Bitch List" for this alleged "Judge". She ignored an initial challenge of her jurisdiction, issued the very first time I appeared in front of her, didn't address that challenge for 3 WEEKS (challenges to jurisdiction are supposed to be addressed IMMEDIATELY, before another proceeding or judicial action can take place); then claimed an unlawful jurisdiction to try me under, without any proof. Then, because I had asked for a jury trial in this simple misdemeanor case, but had just submitted it a couple of days before they had combined cases for it and my felony trial (that ran parallel with this case) and had misplaced that motion to ask for it, she would then OK a submission of a court produced motion that was not designed by me, that didn't show that I wanted one; then, to cover up their screw-up, changed the record of the court to state that I had specifically asked for a NON-jury trial in that motion, and denied me that. From what I gather, this Judge spends an awful lot of her free time drinking (I would too, if I were involved in the shite these Polk County Judges get away with daily...anything to alleviate the pangs of guilt, eh?), and shouldn't really be on the bench, after just THESE shenanigans.
The picture above? The product of a well-planned photo shoot, I'm thinking. The times I appeared in front of her, I was ready to change the E in her last name to a well-deserved U, due to both her looks, and her rather ugly soul.
 |
| Judge William Kelly |
Judge William Kelly is young yet...his only saving grace. He seems OK, not quite as corrupt as the ones that have been around FOREVER...but this Judge already has a black smudge on his record. This man, on the record of the court even, denied me the right to defend myself in my own person, unless I took on, at the very least, a state provided attorney. Yes, you heard that, he denied me the right to get case files, hear evidence, etc...and defend myself, while I was incarcerated. For those of you still lost, that means that I was not able to do all those things the Constitution guarantees me, as long as I was locked up. I'd say that's a pretty hefty smudge.
 |
| Magistrate Anastasia Hurn |
Now Magistrate Anastasia Hurn was mentored by, and, evidently, reports to, none other than Judge William Price. This in and of itself is more than enough for me, personally. Add to that, she ruled that I had harassed those poor members of the Des Moines media, in particular CityView managing editor Daryl Tromblay and kid reporter Jeffrey Pitts; by asking them to keep their word and report on Des Moines corrupt officials and courts, where I was concerned. Of course, when 2 months after that promise had gone by, and I had yet to here from these folks, I got a wee bit upset. We had been in constant ambiguous contact, via email, for nearly 2 years prior to this, and had never had an issue...until I asked for them to complete the promise I had hoped they would make, after witnessing this apparent series of judicial horrors. C'mon...I had a head editor's signature on an email, promising that he would do the story...how could a judge fault me for emailing them twice to ask WTF, why they hadn't even made a move after 2 whole months? Funnier still, the managing editor, on the record, testified that stealing my child unlawfully using no provable allegations didn't constitute a story. The fact that they found me innocent of those allegations, but still didn't restore my rights or my child wasn't news either, evidently. I suppose that the written email, (which, in any court of law, be essentially a signed contract) wasn't sufficient cause to email them asking why they hadn't done anything. Let's not forget that Judge Price had come into the court room prior to the start of the trial by judge, to tell his prize magistrate pupil to "Get Him...he's a piece of cake" before he left her chambers.
This magistrate deserves a place on Polk County's "Evil Judges to Watch" list. She's going to do great things for Iowa, I guarantee it.
Anastasia, unfortunately, was the only magistrate or judge I could find, in Polk County, with a facebook profile. I'd like to thank her for posting this great candid picture of her having some beach fun, like us regular folks, after corruptly ruling against me in my harassment case. Funny I can't see her profile anymore...I wonder what happened? We were getting along so well too!
 |
| Judge Jeanie Vaudt |
This spot I intend to reserve for Judge Jeanie Vaudt. Now to be fair, she hasn't ruled against me....YET, in my post-conviction relief case. She did, however, refuse me my right to videotape our proceedings, and did quash the only official's subpoena I was able to get served for my post-conviction case...her buddy John P. Sarcone (See evil official's list, later to be added to this article), Polk County Iowa's head racist and most criminal County Attorney. I'm certain that, in a few short weeks, she'll fill the reservation I made for her here, just like every other judge in Polk County, Iowa. It seems funny to me that hardly anyone ever wins out against the State...any state, for that matter. Gee...I wonder why? They sure don't have much problem appealing and appealing and appealing when and if they should lose, using your hard-earned tax dollars to try you over and over again...until they win...or at the very least, get a stalemate. The numbers, showing how many times the state wins out against John Q. Criminal are, of course, more important to show us. We can't have those numbers, showing how many of those "criminals" were cleared, expunged or admonished of the county attorneys allegations, getting too high. Then the jig, the court cash cow, would be "up", as it were, and Iowa would lose out on some of its fed funding to keep a certain so amount of people in jail, at any one time. Can't have that...right??
INTERMISSION
You know, I feel it's best that I put in a little something right here before I move on to the crooked officials list for Polk County, Iowa.
Folks, I don't care how experienced he is, or how many cases have come up before him; a judge that's been on the bench too long starts pidgeon-holing. I'm sorry, but I'm afraid it's inevitable. After a flurry of cases, with usually no time in-between to study them, and everybody starts looking the same. It's important that you people think for yourselves, and for me to plant this in your mind...there is no way on God's green earth that any judge anyplace can decide the fate of any case, fairly and impartially, What about the jury you ask? Funny you should ask that, having a jury? Is often worse. I'd really like to explain that statement to you, but unless you get arrested, and take it to trial (and make it there...the majority of cases these days often do not see a trial, because of "offers"), you're never going to know exactly what I mean. What you see on your television screens does it no justice. The jury is programmed...they call it admonishing. I call it brainwashing, continued; after your initial life brainwashing. I'm really certain that it depends on how much attention a case is getting from the outside. These juries do not see or hear half of what they should. They're quite often told to break, and then all the juicy stuff that they SHOULD be hearing as well, happens. Oh, they'll say it's because they don't want what's being done or said to influence the jurors (they most certainly don't want them influenced to find you innocent, that's apparent), but there is more to it than that, rest assured.
No my friends, the courtroom is a one-sided nightmare, often in favor of whoever is bringing the charges...and 99% of the time, that's the "State" or the Feds. The funny thing is, the State, or the people thereof, couldn't tell you a single thing about it...and in case you haven't figured out what I'm driving at, it's because the State doesn't know anything about your case, the case of the guy sitting next to you in handcuffs...or anyone else's case for that matter either...unless its highly publicized. The majority of all cases that flow through a courtroom are unknown, unseen, etc. by ANYONE...and that, my friends, is a dangerous thing. That means that one man or woman that we have given the title of judge to is deciding what happens to countless people; or, in the case of a jury trial, is, with the help of the prosecutor (and, from my experience, often the defense attorney as well) programming them for their desired outcome.
Don't believe that even a little? Bet I can change your mind about that, with extremely little real effort. I hate to tell you this America, the "system" no longer works...as a matter of fact, it hasn't worked for a great many years. What's worse is, you have no real idea whether it works or not...the closest you ever get to any case is by reading about it in a newspaper, or by being in one. You may also know someone that's involved in a case, and you may go to his/her hearings to support them. Usually, if you're in one, it's a civil case, which, of course, is nothing like a criminal case. I hate to be the one to tell you, but Judges Judy, Whopner, Alex, Milraun...you will never see judges like this in a criminal courtroom; or any courtroom for that matter.
One thing I'll note here as well, when I was up before Judge Blink in what was decidedly my first real criminal outing...and, more than likely, my last (not because I'm a changed man, or any of that garbage...but because I'm wiser for the judicial enlightenment I've received during the course of it, and now know what has to be done to avoid it - aside from not committing actual crimes, something I really didn't do); I noted something very important during the course of this trial. I was, initially, certain that Judge Blink, my judge for this fiasco, was a fair and decent man. The funny thing though, was that he wasn't my judge until the actual trial. Funnier still, there were 3 judges that oversaw different stages of my proceedings. There was a judge for the initial appearance, a judge for everything in-between that appearance and trail...and one for the trial itself.
Now, I've thought long and hard about that, and it just whooshed itself into my head...just the other day, matter o' fact...how can your judge at trial fairly rule over a defendant that they haven't been involved with from start to finish? In reality, I have a problem with the concept that they can do that at all; but why wouldn't you do that? Why wouldn't the same judge rule over ALL the proceedings involving any one defendant? And that's when it hit me - there are jury and non-jury judges...certain of these are just better actors than others, and have a better stage presence. It's judges like Blink that have been around the block, and these deal with intended "public" proceedings. And believe me America, when I tell you that what you see when the "public" is around is usually nothing close to what you see behind closed doors, or when someone isn't around to notice that what's being done is not quite right.
For instance, I think it's funny that things like dismissing key evidence and witnesses is done on a rather impromtu date, usually without the defendant even knowing about it, thereby, when no one else knows about it either. No, if someone were there...someone would be WITNESS....and we can't have that!
Blink was a guy who, when the jury was there, was nothing short of a showman. He was polite, and, quite honestly, the closest thing to entertaining a judge could get. This guy was good at what he did...and that's why he was picked to be MY judge...he knew how to handle the public, and he knew, more importantly, how to handle a jury. I had, of course, highly advertised, as well as written about this. I imagine that this is why I also had what was probably the smallest courtroom in the building...smaller courtroom, less witnesses. The benches that were available, all 2 of them, were conveniently filled to the brim with Drake Law students, witnessing their first real trials. My feeling on that, by the way...how can you properly learn about a real trial, unless you're there for the WHOLE trial? Here's another one, how can you REPORT on a real trial, unless you're there for the whole trial? My reporter was there for the opening statement, and for the first of the prosecution's hours of presentation...then proceeded to go out and completely DESTROY \what little reputation I had, after doing absolutely no real viable or relevant research on me or what was happening, didn't approach me or my attorney for my side of the story....nothing. You see America? The only things you see....are everything they want you to, and nothing more.
In case you're still not quite convinced?
OK, that's fair. I can see why. What you see on Law & Order is programming, folks...not because it's an actual program...but because of WHAT IT IS. This show shows the system works, most of the time...and they throw in a glitch in that system once in a while; you know, a case that slips through the cracks, or a criminal that gets away, just to keep you thinking that it's more real. But here's the deal, unless it progresses the same in real life, then everything is suspect.
Let's compare what I went through with Law & Order; not all of it, but just a very few key things.
First, in Law & Order, they seem to always use a Grand Jury to indict the suspects. For those of you who don't know what a Grand Jury is, it's 12 people that are randomly selected to represent the State (even though they only decide via their county, it's technically a state representation) in criminal matters. When a report is filed, someone gathers up the Grand Jury. These people then peruse the charges and to whether there is enough evidence to warrant bringing someone to trial for those charges, and they then decide whether to "Indict" these people or not.
Now, just about every state still has a Grand Jury...but very few use them, unless it's one of the higher crimes. Most of the time, charges against a defendant are brought against them using "Minutes of Testimony", an alternate mentioned in a lot of rules of criminal procedure books. These are not defined very well, but are, essentially, testimonies of key witnesses. The way it works is, police reports are taken, then given to the county attorney, the now OFFICIAL representative for the State, who sifts through them and decides who he's going to pursue or isn't, who the witnesses are, takes their testimony, then uses that to bring the charges. One guy pretty much decides the fate of criminals for the entire county. This isn't how it's supposed to be people.
As to judges, well, same thing applies. Judges should not be the rulers of our fates...we should be. We The People.
OK, but that's where the jury comes in....right? I mean, I was found guilty by an impartial jury of my peers, true?
Well, yes and no. Yes I was...on the surface. On Law & Order, everyone appears to be present during everything...the arraignment, the trial, sentencing, etc. In real life, no one comes for anything but trial; and even they can't see things that happen all the time. Usually, if the jury is asked to break or leave the courtroom, so is the public. WHY? The public isn't deciding the defendant's case, the jury is. So why should it matter what the public stays or leaves? Because most of what happens behind closed doors in a courtroom involves something the court is doing to the defendant that's wrong, or might seem wrong to the average logical viewer...mostly because it is.
Another thing you'll notice, as a defendant anyway, is that programming of the jurors begins almost immediately. Subtle threats are even issued to the jury, by the judge. My favorite was this: "Here's the law. Here's what the defendant allegedly did...if what he did violates the law, you MUST find the defendant guilty." OK, but here's the problem with that. What if the law is BULLSHIT....which of course, if you were to read a good portion of these laws and what they say, you might believe that they are. Most people who read these laws believe that they somehow, inadvertently anyway, had a hand in or that instead someone they know or who they elected to represent them probably enacted this bullshit to be law, and of course, is essentially programmed to believe that this law...is the People's law...so therefore, if the law says it, it must be right, because it's the law. BULLSHIT. This is programming, my good friends, plain and simple. Just because "the law is the law", doesn't make it right, reasonable, good, or logical.
Please, if you do nothing else with your life America, do this: get a State statute book, pick out your favorite crimes and REALLY read through them. What you'll find is a really scary definition of some of them. What I've found is that I commit felonies at the rate of 10 a month, and didn't really know I had. I just don't have time to read through all the BULLSHIT that I had nothing to do with passing, and presents itself as law that I had a hand in that passing; somehow, surely, or inadvertently.
Here's some more proof of programming. We Americans believe, because of most court shows, that the prosecution gives a closing statement, then so does the defense, then the decision is made by the jury. No, this isn't the case anymore, if ever. Remember, this is my first jury trial; it might have been this way all along, for all I knew about courtrooms and trials up to this point. No, in real life (in Iowa anyway), the prosecution goes first, and then the defense closes...then the prosecution offers a rebuttal closing, lastly....WHAT? The prosecution goes TWICE? How is that fair? The judge told me it was because the burden of proof was on them to prove my guilt. HUH? Don't I have the same burden to prove myself innocent? And how does it make that more fair to let them and their bullshit be the last thing in the jury's mind in finding me innocent? The answer is, it doesn't. It helps the State get a better conviction rate, that's for sure...in affect, making the state more money. It also ensures the better part of the judiciary that they will always have their jobs, because of those numbers.
Another thing, Sentencing is usually done on the spot on TV. In real life, it's done on a separate date, usually long after the trial ends. And why isn't a jury, supposedly representing the public or State's opinion on whether someone is guilty or not, present for this?? The answer I imagine to get from the State is that this is an unnecessary thing that might be a burden on the public's already short schedule. I'm sorry; my opinion is, if I assisted in deciding this guy's fate, I wanna see what happens because of my decision. What's more, I'd like to know what people who do things like this get, sentence-wise, if they're found guilty!
The problem here people is this - if you, the juror were to find out what kind of sentence I'd get if you found me guilty for whatever; then A. You may feel guilty for finding me guilty; or B. You might possibly be appalled at the sentence given for the alleged crime committed, and decide to campaign to get it changed, thereby screwing up their money game. Sounds far-fetched...but you have to admit, it IS a system that works - for the State. Usually, at least in Iowa anyway, you were, according to most of those sitting in jail, better off "taking the deal"; and most did. This is why Polk County has their reasonable conviction rate...not because the criminals did it, but because the criminals opt to take whatever gets them out of jail the quickest, so they can feel freedom that much sooner. Everybody wins...except the alleged criminal. And that, America, is what America wants...justice, justice against those who do wrong, no matter what the cost; and, it would seem, no matter whether who we point the finger at actually committed that crime or not.
I also highly suggest that you read your state's books on criminal procedure and civil procedure....especially criminal. You'll start to see that, in today's world, the cards are stacked heavily against the accused, and that the laws passed seem to favor arrest rates and incomes for those who have jobs because of those laws, when we allegedly break them. Another thing you'll notice is that there is an awful lot of law on the books these days that more and more protects and favors those in law enforcement, and those in positions of power. This lends credence, at least to me anyway, that Government and those who work under or protect Government officials are getting too big for their britches. Crimes such as harassment, harassment of public officials, giving police officers a fake name, and not having an ID on your person are very blatant examples of this. Another thing that has also bugged me about this has always been immunities and confidentiality laws. Why do these people need these kinds of laws, unless they're doing the wrong thing? Maybe you wouldn't be harassed, say, if you were doing your job correctly. Maybe people wouldn't give you a fake name is you didn't arrest them every other moment of the day. Why would you need immunity to prosecution, unless you keep doing things wrong to need that protection from being sued? And what possible reason would you have for keeping any legal proceeding "confidential?" Maybe it's so that you can sneak things past the public that you don't want them knowing, hmmm??
Most of all, I suggest that you inquire into why "the people" aren't so involved anymore, where indicting criminals is concerned. Used to be, when we called the police, and they determined who it was they needed to arrest, they used to ask US if we wanted to file charges or not. Have you called them lately? "We the People" don't make those decisions anymore. Now, the "State" (a.k.a., the county or district attorney) or the U.S. Attorney makes those decisions for you, usually completely without your knowledge.
I've known people who called the police, then made a report...then called back later saying they wanted to let it go, or maybe the matter was resolved...and then the person still got arrested. A good example of this might be that you had some money stashed...say $1000, and it came up missing. So you called the police, made the report and your accusations...then the person returned it, say by putting it back...whatever. The State (i.e., the county attorney) can still see the report and file his own charges.
ELECTED OFFICIALS
OK, so that's it for the judge's list. Let's move on to Polk County's Elected Officials.
 |
| Attorney General Tom Miller |
Tom Miller is supposedly still Polk County's Attorney General. This ancient piece of crap needs to be ousted, if this is the real truth. I've heard a lot of crazy things concerning this man. Among them is that he once arose from his seat in Des Moines and made his way to Clinton Iowa, where he excused a social worker from her charges of perjury that had been brought against her in a civil case, because, he stated, "She was immune to prosecution." I've also heard that his son is in jail for all kinds of crazy things as well. Either way, this man has been in office entirely too long...if indeed he really is still in office.
Anyway, this man's office is responsible for fighting you in any case that brings charges against ANY State official, or when you appeal the same official's actions. For example, should you fight the Department of Human Services in their Child Protective Assessment of whether you are actually abusing your children or not, it's the Attorney General's office who defends their side of things.
The only case I ever beat in Iowa was such a case. They even appealed it up to the Director of DHS, who agreed with my side of it. Of course, there wasn't much that he could say. It was way too obvious that they most certainly did mess things up.
This office also was responsible for defending the courts when my termination case went to the appellate courts. I did not fare so well in that one...even though I had just won in the case that showed that I did not abuse my child. So how is it that it was shown that they did wrong in taking the child, yet, didn't do wrong in terminating my rights because of that? Here are documents (and of course, my opinion of all that occurred in those documents) to show that maybe these people aren't quite on the up and up in Iowa.
http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2015/05/the-ol-double-cross-appeal.html
** Honorable corruption-related mentions in this office are as follows:
Katherine Miller-Todd, Asst. Attorney General
Grant Dugdale, Asst. Attorney General
 |
| John P. Sarcone, Polk County Attorney - Iowa |
John P. Sarcone, The official head of the Polk County Attorney's offices, is one of the most corrupt individuals STILL in office in Des Moines Iowa to date. Where do I start here? I think I've done enough on this man and all he has done to me and my family. For links on this guy, well, I'm just going to say that I could almost dedicate my entire blog to getting this man put out of office. I guarantee, that if you were to go just about anywhere in this blog, you would find his name tagged in just about any article I've written. This man even went as far as to call the Secret Service on me, to get me arrested, because he wasn't able to find me. He wanted me arrested so that I would not be able to attend my Termination of Parental rights hearing. He has called the FBI offices, all over the country, in an effort to shut me up and get me off of his case. He wants me gone...or dead...which is fine, since I want the same for him. At the very least, this man deserves serious jail time...not just for what he's done to me, but what he has done to an awful lot of people in Polk County.
Try and call him sometime, at 515-286-3737. Ask to speak to him personally. I dare you to try. His secretary screens his calls for why you're calling. I've seen this man once, I think...in 42 years. His office is lined with bullet-proof glass. These are the actions of a serious criminal, my friends. Stop re-electing this criminal into office, Iowa, PLEASE!
On the right side of this blog, in the brownish side-bar, is a search box. Put in "John P. Sarcone", and stand back. All you would ever want to know about this criminal is right here. Make a note of it.
**Honorable mention of those criminals who work under this criminal attorney:
Linda Lane
Stephanie Brown
Kevin Bell
Kevin Brownell
Jesse Ramirez
- Assistant Polk County Attorneys
For more information about these assistants, just search for them in this blog. I also dedicate a paragraph to each of them further down, when I attack attorneys.
Charles Palmer, Director of the Iowa Department of Human Services, is a criminal of a higher order, and the head of the department that has stolen more children in Iowa than all but 5 other states in the union. Yes, Iowa is #6 in the country for taking children from parents...and never giving them back.
Thank God, that, just about the time that Iowa finally decided to look into what exactly was going on in this state department, this 100 yr. old asshole finally decided to retire. But pay attention, Iowa, because I'm sure that whoever is going to replace this criminal (Jerry Foxhoven) will be no better. More importantly, this department, once it comes out what they have done to Iowa, needs to be stripped down to its bare bones, and all that caused Iowa grief, INCLUDING Charles Palmer, should be brought to justice.
Honorable mention for Iowa DHS employees:
Jeannie Munson, Agitator and Collaberator
Mark Worthington, Agitator and Collaberator
Emily Nieman, S4, Child Protective Services
Stephanie Rhinehart, Supervisor, CPS
Katie Gosch, Caseworker, CPS
For more information on any of these, please search for them in this blog.
Here, Iowa, is your new director. Be on the lookout for more crimes, involving him:
**Honorable mention of those criminals who work under this criminal attorney:
Linda Lane
Stephanie Brown
Kevin Bell
Kevin Brownell
Jesse Ramirez
- Assistant Polk County Attorneys
For more information about these assistants, just search for them in this blog. I also dedicate a paragraph to each of them further down, when I attack attorneys.
 |
| Charles Palmer, Former director of DHS, Iowa |
Charles Palmer, Director of the Iowa Department of Human Services, is a criminal of a higher order, and the head of the department that has stolen more children in Iowa than all but 5 other states in the union. Yes, Iowa is #6 in the country for taking children from parents...and never giving them back.
Thank God, that, just about the time that Iowa finally decided to look into what exactly was going on in this state department, this 100 yr. old asshole finally decided to retire. But pay attention, Iowa, because I'm sure that whoever is going to replace this criminal (Jerry Foxhoven) will be no better. More importantly, this department, once it comes out what they have done to Iowa, needs to be stripped down to its bare bones, and all that caused Iowa grief, INCLUDING Charles Palmer, should be brought to justice.
Honorable mention for Iowa DHS employees:
Jeannie Munson, Agitator and Collaberator
Mark Worthington, Agitator and Collaberator
Emily Nieman, S4, Child Protective Services
Stephanie Rhinehart, Supervisor, CPS
Katie Gosch, Caseworker, CPS
For more information on any of these, please search for them in this blog.
Here, Iowa, is your new director. Be on the lookout for more crimes, involving him:
 |
| Jerry Foxhoven, Current Director, Iowa DHS |
Naturally, I'll be paying close attention...:D
*******************************************************************************************************
Well, it would seem that we need to get going on more corrupt Iowa Officials, the attorneys that I know well. Let's begin with the more recent, and work our way backwards. Now, keep in mind, a lot of these "officials" of the court stay very well hidden, and pictures/info on them is all but impossible to find...but that doesn't or won't exclude their coverage. Some, I found pretty ancient pictures of...and that will do. A few, some of the more corrupt, I've opted to include links to their Linked-In profiles, so that we can blast what they're up to these days as well as what they've done in their oh-so-sordid pasts.
So what do you say we get this pahty stahted?
We'll start with the County Attorney's office, and John P. Sarcone's assistants in his crimes. We'll begin with the one that's attacking me right....this...minute, Mr. Jesse Ramirez. Here's his mug:
NOTE: I picked this one, because he's wearing glasses, like he is now. I'd say he's about 20 in this picture, approximately 8 years before I met him.
Now, I shouldn't have to tell you everything this slime ball has done to me, mostly because there are about 15 articles here in this blog, all just recently written (See all articles just above and below this one, entitled "The State Post-Conviction Relief Case"). This one is on our "Evil Attorneys to Watch" list, for sure.
Another infamous FORMER county attorney under the thumb of John Sarcone once upon a time is none other than Linda Lane, pictured below:
who, according to her Linked In profile, found here:
is now a (probably more so) corrupt Asst. U.S. Attorney...though no longer in Iowa (you Iowa "lawbreakers" can thank your lucky stars). I will, of course, be finding out exactly where SHE is, mostly because we have unfinished business in Federal Court. For more on all that she did, all you need do is peruse just about any article from 2016 in my archives, or, you can just jump up a few articles to my "transcripts" articles under my "State Post-Conviction Relief Case" Series.
Now attorney Dale Mays, of Benzoni Law Firm fame in Des Moines, Iowa, pictured at a much younger age here: (sorry, this was all I could find, America)
is a snake of a lawyer of a higher order. This man screwed my wife over by staying silent in each and every juvenile hearing we had, and weaseled out of getting slapped on the wrist for not doing his job...and doing it UNLAWFULLY as well. For more on what this man does when he "does his job", see about any article I wrote here from 6/22/2014 until May of 2015. Here, let me get you started with one of the better ones:
and for a more complete list of his incompetent infractions, you can go here as well:
And yes, that was BENZONI LAW FIRM in Des Moines, Iowa...don't forget that.
Now we move on to assistant county attorneys and a state of Iowa GAL that are so corrupt that NO information can be found on these people WHATSOEVER, save a case law quote here and there. No pictures of these criminals could be located either, though, when you search the names, the only things that come up in their image counterparts are from my blog. They, of course, deserve extra special mention.
Kevin Brownell, who was the Asst. Polk County Attorney in our later juvenile cases, had me thrown out of my own case that I had been in for 6 months, because I was the legal father of our child, not the biological one, when the evidence against him, the judge and the State was so damning that there was no other way out, but to get me out of it.
Stephanie Brown, another assistant, was the one that brought a whole list of false allegations against us (that we were later cleared of, by the very agency that removed her), and who purported to be an advocate for the department of Human Services.
Kevin Bell was the assistant County Attorney who brought false charges against me in my first harassment of social workers back in 2015. He later dropped the more serious charge, when the damage had already been done, and when it was discovered that he had no proof of his allegation. He would state in the dismissal that he did it because I plead to the lesser simple misdemeanors...and that the charge against me for threatening these social workers lives (something I didn't do) could just be ignored because of it.
Finally, the last and final corrupt official worth mention is Paul White, a cobra State of Iowa GAL (Guardian Ad Litem), who did absolutely nothing but sit in court in his $1000 suit and look pretty, and point his finger at us, the "criminal" parents.
Well, America, here is your blueprint. Should you want to join into the fun, please contact me on FB, or email me using the email at the top of this article.
Now we move on to assistant county attorneys and a state of Iowa GAL that are so corrupt that NO information can be found on these people WHATSOEVER, save a case law quote here and there. No pictures of these criminals could be located either, though, when you search the names, the only things that come up in their image counterparts are from my blog. They, of course, deserve extra special mention.
Kevin Brownell, who was the Asst. Polk County Attorney in our later juvenile cases, had me thrown out of my own case that I had been in for 6 months, because I was the legal father of our child, not the biological one, when the evidence against him, the judge and the State was so damning that there was no other way out, but to get me out of it.
Stephanie Brown, another assistant, was the one that brought a whole list of false allegations against us (that we were later cleared of, by the very agency that removed her), and who purported to be an advocate for the department of Human Services.
Kevin Bell was the assistant County Attorney who brought false charges against me in my first harassment of social workers back in 2015. He later dropped the more serious charge, when the damage had already been done, and when it was discovered that he had no proof of his allegation. He would state in the dismissal that he did it because I plead to the lesser simple misdemeanors...and that the charge against me for threatening these social workers lives (something I didn't do) could just be ignored because of it.
Finally, the last and final corrupt official worth mention is Paul White, a cobra State of Iowa GAL (Guardian Ad Litem), who did absolutely nothing but sit in court in his $1000 suit and look pretty, and point his finger at us, the "criminal" parents.
EPILOGUE
Well, America, here is your blueprint. Should you want to join into the fun, please contact me on FB, or email me using the email at the top of this article.
Until you do...this is the mighty sword, signing out, until the decision in my state post-conviction case.
************************************************************************************************
ATTENTION!!
A good friend of mine could really use some more votes to get a judge out of office, by the way...and with that, he posted some very enlightening information, for those of you who still doubt that our system of law and those who purport to uphold it is a sham. For those of you who still believe what we've been duped into believing, that "The system works", I suggest you read it well!! Thank you Michael C. School! (again...lol) I highly recommend his website for relevant LAWFUL information concerning this very thing and other similar subjects. Please note too, Michael C. School, that your name, along with others, now graces the list of websites I support. :D Now for his contribution:
There are no "Judges" just BAR Attorneys.... Gloria Navarro is an executive trust administrator FRC vs. GE 281 U.S. 464, Keller vs. PE 261 U.S. 428, 1 Stat. 138 -178) “Judges do not enforce statutes and codes. Executive Administrators enforce statutes and codes.
Gloria Navarro has a Certificate of Standing on file to practice law on file with the federal courts same as any other BAR Attorney.
MILITARY FLAG WITH THE GOLD FRINGE
Martial Law Flag "Pursuant to 4 U.S.C. chapter 1, §§1, 2, & 3; Executive Order 10834, August 21, 1959; 24 F.R.6865; a military flag is a flag that resembles the regular flag of the United States, except that it has a YELLOW FRINGE border on three sides. The President of the United States designates this deviation from the regular flag, by executive order, and in his capacity as Commander-in-Chief of the military. The placing of a fringe on the national flag, the dimensions of the flag and the arrangement of the stars in the union are matters of detail not controlled by statute, but are within the discretion of the President as Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy." 34 Ops. Atty. Gen. 83.The Law of the Flag regulates the laws under which contracts entered into will be governed. (See Ruhstrat v. People.)
Any courtroom that displays such a flag behind the Judge is a military courtroom which Is operating under military law and not constitutional law, or common law, or civil law, or statute law, Restrictions. (Note added: This court is thereby receiving public funds under false and fraudulent pretense and is committing Treason against the Constitution under the 16th American Jurist Prudence Section 177).
Whereas : 1,2 American Flag such as a gold fringe MUTILATES the flag and carries a one year prison term. This is confirmed by the authority of Title 36, Section § 176 (g). The gold fringe is a fourth color and, purportedly, represents “color of military law” jurisdiction and when placed on the Title 4 U.S.C. Section §§ 1,2 Flag, mutilates the flag and suspends the Constitution. Refer to Title 18 U.S.C. Section 242, see BLACK’S LAW DICTIONARY.
Uniform Bonding Code- 5.4 - Bonding of Judges
A judge shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable:
1. if he fails to protect the U.S, national constitutionally guaranteed remedies of due process and the equal protection of the laws of any citizen appearing in his court of law, or of any citizen appearing in any court of the county in which he works whose case may come to his attention 12y a means.
5.5 - Bonding of Attorneys http://www.citizensactionnetworks.com/…/code_section_6068.p…
An attorney shall lose his bonding, shall not be bonded, and shall be deemed unbondable,:
if he fails to protect the remedies of due process and the equal protection of the law of either his client or of the adverse party in an action. In an adversary system of law, each lawyer or attorney shall protect the representation of fact not only for their own party, but shall protect the legal process for both parties without, exception.
OATH OF OFFICE MAKES PUBLIC OFFICIALS “FOREIGN”
Those holding Federal or State public office, county or municipal office, under the Legislative, Executive or Judicial branch, including Court Officials, Judges, Prosecutors, Law Enforcement Department employees, Officers of the Court, and etc., before entering into these public offices, are required by the U.S. Constitution and statutory law to comply with Title 5 USC, Sec. §3331, “Oath of office.” State Officials are also required to meet this same obligation, according to State Constitutions and State statutory law.
All oaths of office come under 22 CFR, Foreign Relations, Sections §§92.12 - 92.30, and all who hold public office come under Title 8 USC, Section §1481 “Loss of nationality by native-born or naturalized citizen; voluntary action; burden of proof; presumptions.”
Under Title 22 USC, Foreign Relations and Intercourse, Section §611, a Public Official is considered a foreign agent. In order to hold public office, the candidate must file a true and complete registration statement with the State Attorney General as a foreign principle.
The Oath of Office requires the public official in his / her foreign state capacity to uphold the constitutional form of government or face consequences.
Title 10 USC, Sec. §333, “Interference with State and Federal law”
The President, by using the militia or the armed forces, or both, or by any other means, shall take such measures as he considers necessary to suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy, if it—
(1) so hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or
(2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.
In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution.
Such willful action, while serving in official capacity, violates Title 18 USC, Section §1918:
Title 18 USC, Section §1918 “Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the government”
Title 18 USC, Section §1918 “Disloyalty and asserting the right to strike against the government”
Whoever violates the provision of 7311 of title 5 that an individual may not accept or hold a position in the Government of the United States or the government of the District of Columbia if he—
(1) advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government;
(2) Is a member of an organization that he knows advocates the overthrow of our constitutional form of government; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year and a day, or both. And also deprives claimants of “honest services:
Title 18, Section §1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud”
“For the purposes of this chapter, the term “scheme or artifice to defraud” includes a scheme or artifice to deprive another of the intangible right of honest services.
and the treaties that placed your public offices in that foreign state under international law and under the United Nation jurisdiction:
and the treaties that placed your public offices in that foreign state under international law and under the United Nation jurisdiction:
49 Stat. 3097; Treaty Series 881 CONVENTION ON RIGHTS AND DUTIES OF STATES
1945 IOIA –That the International Organizations Act of December 29, 1945 (59 Stat. 669; Title 22, Sections 288 to 2886 U.S.C.) the US relinquished every office
TITLE 8 > CHAPTER 12 > SUBCHAPTER I > § 1101
The term “foreign state” includes outlying possessions of a foreign state, but self-governing dominions or territories under mandate or trusteeship shall be regarded as separate foreign states
The Oath of office is a quid pro quo contract cf [U.S. Const. Art. 6, Clauses 2 and 3, Davis Vs. Lawyers Surety Corporation., 459 S.W. 2nd. 655, 657., Tex. Civ. App.] in which clerks, officials, or officers of the government pledge to perform (Support and uphold the United States and state Constitutions) in return for substance (wages, perks, benefits). Proponents are subjected to the penalties and remedies for Breach of Contract, Conspiracy cf [Title 18 U.S.C., Sections 241, 242]. Treason under the Constitution at Article 3, Section 3., and Intrinsic Fraud cf [Auerbach v Samuels, 10 Utah 2nd. 152, 349 P. 2nd. 1112,1114. Alleghany Corp v Kirby., D.C.N.Y. 218 F. Supp. 164, 183., and Keeton Packing Co. v State., 437 S.W. 20, 28]. Refusing to live by their oath places them in direct violation of their oath, in every case. Violating their oath is not just cause for immediate dismissal and removal from office, it is a federal crime. Federal law regulating oath of office by government officials is divided into four parts along with an executive order which further defines the law for purposes of enforcement. 5 U.S.C. 3331, provides the text of the actual oath of office members of Congress are required to take before assuming office. 5 U.S.C. 3333 requires members of Congress sign an affidavit that they have taken the oath of office required by 5 U.S.C. 3331 and have not or will not violate that oath of office during their tenure of office as defined by the third part of the law, 5 U.S.C. 7311 which explicitly makes it a federal criminal offense (and a violation of oath of office) for anyone employed in the United States Government (including members of Congress) to “advocate the overthrow of our constitutional form of government”
Is Gloria Navarro registered as a Foreign Agent? FARA.GOV
http://www.citizensactionnetworks.com/…/Prosecutorial%20Mis…
For more proof of our U.S. Judicial corruption and the mockery of our Constitution and all it's supposed to provide us free citizens, as well as provide us FREE justice, visit Michael's page at:
www.citizensactionnetworks.com
Tell'em Christopher (Bruce) the living man sentcha...:D
For more proof of our U.S. Judicial corruption and the mockery of our Constitution and all it's supposed to provide us free citizens, as well as provide us FREE justice, visit Michael's page at:
www.citizensactionnetworks.com
Tell'em Christopher (Bruce) the living man sentcha...:D
