Whaaa? How did you know? Who told you? Yes, just 14 days out from trial, I sent a letter to John P. Sarcone...personally. Here's what it said:
Now, you may think this was a bit uncalled for...but there was a purpose to this, that you are about to be informed of.
You see, there were a few problems on the defense's side...if you have no idea what I'm talking about, then by all means, read the following articles...then it will be most clear:
You see, there is...and was no way for the defense (the State) to win out here...The complaint filed is QUITE CLEAR about the infractions committed during the case to put me away for a year in the Polk County Jail. Guess what happened not long after I filed the case?
Linda Lane, the head prosecutor in that case (as well as just about every other misdemeanor case that occurred right alongside of it)...resigned her position with the Iowa Polk County Attorney's office. 'Magine that. I'm sure you know why. If you don't, let me bring you folks up to it, and rub your faces in it...just for S's and G's:
SHE CONSPIRED, OR WAS THE PUPPET FOR JOHN P. SARCONE, AND WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING GUILTY VERDICTS FOR ME IN EVERY CRIMINAL CASE FOR 2016...and I prove that...over, and over again. Rather than risk her career (her being a young and promising lawyer), she did a very smart thing: She quit.
Good girl Linda Lane. You did that before you got in too deep, like the rest of the criminals...problem is, you didn't get out fast enough. Your name is on the Bruce Bitch List, and once you're there, you STAY there...until you get what's comin' to you...legally, of course.
I didn't know she had quit, by the way...not until yesterday, when I contacted John Sarcone's offices, and asked for Ms. Lane...to whit, they mentioned that she was no longer employed there. I have to wonder whether she quit, or was asked to quit, because she refused to cooperate, or whether she got wise and ducked out before the bomb hit...it's hard to say. The point being, another Assistant PCA had to assume the case in her stead. Enter one Jesse Ramirez, another criminal puppet of John P.'s. Fortunately? This one's a real idiot.
First of all, he has yet to legally appear in the case. 2nd, you would not believe what they're trying to do, to get the inevitable staved off. Yes, they want a continuance...but you're just gonna die laughing when you see how.
Anyway, the letter above, the one that might have been uncalled for? Was most certainly called for. You see, the PCA's office couldn't tell me the person who had subbed for Linda...mostly, I'm sure, because there HADN'T been anyone else yet so assigned. Therefore, the letter above was a poke to make sure that John P. was still alive and kicking. He was. And his response? Was to assign THIS criminal half-wit to the case, ASAP, and have him put out this letter, to both me...and the judge.
Now please, before you go any further, take special note of this idiot's attempt to keep this conversation between him, I, and the judge in the case, confidential. Keep in mind, also, that this is a case on THE PUBLIC RECORD...a civil case. All communications between this guy and ANYBODY is PUBLIC RECORD. You can't just magically make these things confidential by simply saying it, you have to have a good reason.
Attached to it, was this motion to recast the complaint (meaning, he wants me to submit it again, revised, so that he can "answer it properly"), and continue the case. Please, by all means, laugh your heads off. Keep in mind, this is the move of several desperate men.
Let's begin with the fact that this request for a recast of the complaint is happening at month 5 1/2, 4 1/2 months past the time allowed by the courts to answer it, and a mere two weeks before the actual trial concerning the complaint is to be held, let alone state that it's "unintelligible", or not able to be read or understood. Let's also state that the witnesses in this case were about to be subpoenaed, at the plaintiff's expense. Thank God I hadn't done that yet, right? You would have seen a rather furious plaintiff, had I spent money to do that by this time.
The "claims" are quite simple. They wrongfully put me jail, utilizing every trick on the books. For that, I want relief. The relief is clearly stated, based on that claim. You would think that just the fact that I applied for post-conviction relief should auto-produce a claim, wouldn't you? I filed for it, based on wrongdoing, and that wrongdoing is very clearly stated...in the claim itself on the application, in the minutes of testimony, and several other places as well.
Now, per usual, my motion for resistance, in response. Please, also, take note of the paragraph, giving the court MY opinion on this dumbass's Confidentiality clause:
Now there's one thing I'd like to say about Jesse's little letter to the judge in this case: Notice how it's dated the same day as my letter to John P., within just hours of my sending John his love letter even? I'd say this proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt even, that this motion, produced by the current un-documented attorney in charge of this case; gotten, I'm sure, at the last minute, is doing this in desperation, at John's command. Tsk, Tsk Johnny boy. Bad move on your part. This one could very well be your tie to conspiracy against my civil rights...in the Fed Case, forthcoming. OK EVERYBODY, SAY AWWWWW!
In case you haven't quite put your finger on what this all means, it means that I went to Iowa for nothing. You and I both know that the criminal element in Polk County is going to grant this continuance. They'll stretch the shit out forever and ever, until they get me to give up. Problem is? Ain't happening. Lastly, I have one parting shot for the Judge in this case, Judge Jeanie Vaudt. Your name, as YET, is NOT on the BBL...but it will be if you grant this continuance. If nothing else, you shall, with this article, be forever immortalized...as will Jesse whatever the hell his name is. The Wetback criminal county attorney...you know, the one that works for the WOP CRIMINAL JOHN P. SARCONE. See you in court...I don't care WHEN IT GETS CONTINUED TO...I WILL BE THERE, DICKHEADS.
NOTE: The date this request for a recast and for a continuance is heard, by the way, is 8:30 the day before the trial, on April 26th...in case you'd like to be present for this kangaroo shit. :D
 |
| Jeanie Vaudt, District 5C Judge in charge of the PCCE case. |
