The State Post-Conviction Relief Case, Part V - The Continuance

Well, as I'm sure you may have already guessed, the case has indeed been continued.  Mostly because I asked it to be, before the State was granted their request.  Why, you might ask?  Because if I hadn't done it, if nothing else for the reason that, if I hadn't, the State would have gotten theirs anyway...but I had to, because, if trial had happened tomorrow, there would have been no witnesses present for the petitioner...me, of course, simply because I did not serve subpoenas yet, knowing the state would be granted THEIR continuance.  The other reason, of course, is that Linda Lane, former prosecutor and essential witness for the plaintiff in this case...me, of course, has not only resigned her position in Polk County...she has mysteriously vanished...to another position like-minded, out of State...conveniently, and the Polk County Attorney has made it clear that if I want to find her, I will have to hire a private investigator to do so, and that they will resist her being a witness to this case as well...also conveniently.

I say, resist away.  Resistance does not guarantee that she will NOT testify.  She will.  A private investigator WILL be hired to find her, and she will do so, mainly because she just has to.  How could she not?  She was the prosecutor.  It's obvious, that if I am to get true justice, she will have to testify.  Should she or any other witness I intend to call NOT testify, then things might just look a little one-sided, wouldn't they?  We wouldn't want that, now would we?  Not in front of the inquiring minds of America, concerning our judiciary.  Not in front of reporters and the Executive branch of our Government.  Not on the public record.  Quote all the case law you want, criminal lackey for John P., Jesse Ramirez.  Screw this up, and America will have your head.  Maybe quite literally.

See, you people in Polk County shall be made an example of...as will the District Federal Court here in Iowa.  Some have already done this.  Special mention will be made concerning the case of Wzorak comma Gene (Yes Goldie Moore, I mean you and yours).  It's about time for a judicial over-haul, and no Executive Branch excuse will suffice here (I'm referring now to their excuse that the Executive Branch cannot "interfere" in matters of the Judicial Branch, or the Legislative Branch, and vicey versey).  The people have had it, America itself has had it, and, quite extensively, I have had it.  This change of the way things are will occur in my lifetime, unless, of course, someone manages to cut that lifetime off at the pinky.  Guess we'll just see won't we?

So, the facts of the matter are thusly:  The case is continued until July 5-6.  America will most CERTAINLY be invited, with proper and timely notice.  All case filings will be published, you guessed it, right here, on ADS.  As I, the living man, am currently involved in acquiring all that I need to PROPERLY restart the "Wake Up America"tour (meaning, with a vehicle, and actual cash flow) and get a new base of operations, there will not be a whole lot of me that you'll be seeing for yet another month or two...although this does NOT mean that there will not be new articles...there will ALWAYS be that, if naught else...but when all of that is accomplished, the war will be waged and fought anew against injustice...in my life, in other's lives, and in America and the world's lives, on that you can most certainly be assured.  The case files, along with their transcripts, will be published right here, as previously promised, when I have more than one outlet and internet service.  Thank God we have all this continued extra time, so that I can get back to my life...such as it is and has been.

As a parting shot at Jesse Ramirez and the crooks of the County Attorney's office, in Des Moines, Iowa, and John P. Sarcone, head crook, in two parts:  A.  Change is coming.  Sooner than you expect, bet on it.  Iowa is just a part of that change.  I am just a part of that change.  America is sick of your criminal actions, as a whole, and the judiciary that backs you up.  The fleecing of America's working and lower classes WILL end, and it will end quickly.  B.  Once the complaint against the State of Iowa was recast (at my doing, see the article below this one for that complaint, so that this document won't be so much a mystery), there was, rather quickly, an answer by the moron Jesse Ramirez.  Here was that answer, with all the work this feeble mind put into it:

"COMES NOW, the respondent, State of Iowa, by and through Assistant Polk County Attorney, Jesse Ramirez, and hereby answers the Applicant's Application for Post Conviction Relief as filed on April 17th, 2017, as follows:

DIVISION I

The Respondant admits the allegations in Division I.

DIVISION II

The Respondent denies the allegations in Division II

DIVISION III

The Respondent denies the allegations in Division III.

DIVISION IV

The Respondent denies the allegations in Division IV

DIVISION V

The Respondent denies the allegations in Division V.

DIVISION VI

The Respondent denies the allegations in Division VI.

DIVISION VII

The Respondent denies the allegations in Division VII.

DIVISION VIII

The Respondent denies the allegations in Division VIII.

WHEREFORE, the Respondent respectfully requests the Court overrule and deny the Application for Post Conviction Relief.

Respectfully submitted,
JOHN P. SARCONE
Polk County Attorney

JESSE RAMIREZ
Assistant Polk County Attorney"


(Sorry, had to retype the document for you, since my scanner went on the blink for a minute.  The actual court document WILL replace this, eventually)

Note first that, the only section they admit to, is the charges, the conviction, and the judge in charge.  They deny everything else.  Of course, they would.  Note also that this idiot (and John P., standing behind him) just assumes that, since they deny everything, that the court should just over-rule and deny the application.

Did the court over-rule and deny the application?  ARE YOU SERIOUS?  How could they and live with themselves?  Of course they did not, they really just can't.  The allegations are just too....THERE.  The application, as it stands, HAS MERIT.  The matter will come to trial for sure just after July 4th.  Again...nice.  I like that.  More details considering this matter, will of course come as they arise...but I don't know about you, but I can do without them arising for a while, until I can get relocated and get my life back together, after these people ruined it...here in Iowa...like I care about that.  The sooner I can say I'll never be back here, the better.  Until July 4th then, this is the living man, signing out for a while...concerning this case, that is.  :D

SPECIAL NOTE:  Seems Ms. Lane won't be too hard to locate, nor will I "have to" hire a "private investigator" to find her.  She has now been promoted to ASSISTANT U.S. ATTORNEY...wow, huh?  And right here in Des Moines, Iowa, not "out of state" as I was led to believe.  Thanks go out to Ms. Lane for being prompt in updating her Linked In profile.  Thanks also to Google for finding that out for me.  Private Investigator indeed.  Who needs those when you have the handy-dandy internet at your home finger-tips?  Kiss my ass Jesse "The Moron" Ramirez!  That's MR. Private Investigator, to you.  :D

The State Post-Conviction Relief Case, Part III

Guess what kids?  I SAID, GUESS WHAT KIDS???

Whaaa?  How did you know?  Who told you?  Yes, just 14 days out from trial, I sent a letter to John P. Sarcone...personally.  Here's what it said:

Now, you may think this was a bit uncalled for...but there was a purpose to this, that you are about to be informed of.

You see, there were a few problems on the defense's side...if you have no idea what I'm talking about, then by all means, read the following articles...then it will be most clear:

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-state-level-post-conviction-relief.html

http://themightyswordamericasdeadlysins.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-state-post-conviction-relief-case.html

You see, there is...and was no way for the defense (the State) to win out here...The complaint filed is QUITE CLEAR about the infractions committed during the case to put me away for a year in the Polk County Jail.  Guess what happened not long after I filed the case?

Linda Lane, the head prosecutor in that case (as well as just about every other misdemeanor case that occurred right alongside of it)...resigned her position with the Iowa Polk County Attorney's office.  'Magine that.  I'm sure you know why.  If you don't, let me bring you folks up to it, and rub your faces in it...just for S's and G's:

SHE CONSPIRED, OR WAS THE PUPPET FOR JOHN P. SARCONE, AND WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN GETTING GUILTY VERDICTS FOR ME IN EVERY CRIMINAL CASE FOR 2016...and I prove that...over, and over again.  Rather than risk her career (her being a young and promising lawyer), she did a very smart thing:  She quit.

Good girl Linda Lane.  You did that before you got in too deep, like the rest of the criminals...problem is, you didn't get out fast enough.  Your name is on the Bruce Bitch List, and once you're there, you STAY there...until you get what's comin' to you...legally, of course.

I didn't know she had quit, by the way...not until yesterday, when I contacted John Sarcone's offices, and asked for Ms. Lane...to whit, they mentioned that she was no longer employed there.  I have to wonder whether she quit, or was asked to quit, because she refused to cooperate, or whether she got wise and ducked out before the bomb hit...it's hard to say.  The point being, another Assistant PCA had to assume the case in her stead.  Enter one Jesse Ramirez, another criminal puppet of John P.'s.  Fortunately?  This one's a real idiot.

First of all, he has yet to legally appear in the case.  2nd, you would not believe what they're trying to do, to get the inevitable staved off.  Yes, they want a continuance...but you're just gonna die laughing when you see how.

Anyway, the letter above, the one that might have been uncalled for?  Was most certainly called for.  You see, the PCA's office couldn't tell me the person who had subbed for Linda...mostly, I'm sure, because there HADN'T been anyone else yet so assigned.  Therefore, the letter above was a poke to make sure that John P. was still alive and kicking.  He was.  And his response?  Was to assign THIS criminal half-wit to the case, ASAP, and have him put out this letter, to both me...and the judge.

Now please, before you go any further, take special note of this idiot's attempt to keep this conversation between him, I, and the judge in the case, confidential.  Keep in mind, also, that this is a case on THE PUBLIC RECORD...a civil case.  All communications between this guy and ANYBODY is PUBLIC RECORD.  You can't just magically make these things confidential by simply saying it, you have to have a good reason.

Attached to it, was this motion to recast the complaint (meaning, he wants me to submit it again, revised, so that he can "answer it properly"), and continue the case.  Please, by all means, laugh your heads off.  Keep in mind, this is the move of several desperate men.

Let's begin with the fact that this request for a recast of the complaint is happening at month 5 1/2, 4 1/2 months past the time allowed by the courts to answer it, and a mere two weeks before the actual trial concerning the complaint is to be held, let alone state that it's "unintelligible", or not able to be read or understood.  Let's also state that the witnesses in this case were about to be subpoenaed, at the plaintiff's expense.  Thank God I hadn't done that yet, right?  You would have seen a rather furious plaintiff, had I spent money to do that by this time.

The "claims" are quite simple.  They wrongfully put me jail, utilizing every trick on the books.  For that, I want relief.  The relief is clearly stated, based on that claim.  You would think that just the fact that I applied for post-conviction relief should auto-produce a claim, wouldn't you?  I filed for it, based on wrongdoing, and that wrongdoing is very clearly stated...in the claim itself on the application, in the minutes of testimony, and several other places as well.

Now, per usual, my motion for resistance, in response.  Please, also, take note of the paragraph, giving the court MY opinion on this dumbass's Confidentiality clause:

Now there's one thing I'd like to say about Jesse's little letter to the judge in this case:  Notice how it's dated the same day as my letter to John P., within just hours of my sending John his love letter even?  I'd say this proves, beyond a shadow of a doubt even, that this motion, produced by the current un-documented attorney in charge of this case; gotten, I'm sure, at the last minute, is doing this in desperation, at John's command.  Tsk, Tsk Johnny boy.  Bad move on your part.  This one could very well be your tie to conspiracy against my civil rights...in the Fed Case, forthcoming.  OK EVERYBODY, SAY AWWWWW!

In case you haven't quite put your finger on what this all means, it means that I went to Iowa for nothing.  You and I both know that the criminal element in Polk County is going to grant this continuance.  They'll stretch the shit out forever and ever, until they get me to give up.  Problem is?  Ain't happening.  Lastly, I have one parting shot for the Judge in this case, Judge Jeanie Vaudt.  Your name, as YET, is NOT on the BBL...but it will be if you grant this continuance.  If nothing else, you shall, with this article, be forever immortalized...as will Jesse whatever the hell his name is.  The Wetback criminal county attorney...you know, the one that works for the WOP CRIMINAL JOHN P. SARCONE.  See you in court...I don't care WHEN IT GETS CONTINUED TO...I WILL BE THERE, DICKHEADS.

NOTE:  The date this request for a recast and for a continuance is heard, by the way, is 8:30 the day before the trial, on April 26th...in case you'd like to be present for this kangaroo shit.  :D

Jeanie Vaudt, District 5C Judge in charge of the PCCE case.