Hey kids....just wanted to present yet another motion that will NOT be addressed, I'm sure...yet another masterpiece from the twisted mind of soon-to-be-Governor-of-Iowa Christopher Bruce. Enjoy! Also wanted to let you know that more has been added to both the posts concerning court docs so far...both July and August have new stuff, stuff I forgot to add. GOOD stuff...like I said, keep coming back to the oldies, for they will change mucho!
*************************************************************************************************
1. That on the date of February 16th, 2015, a report of Termination was
completed by DHS, and efiled with this court on February 18th; 2015.
2. On this same date, several voicemails were also filed, transcribed as
recorded of this father at the offices of DHS.
3. During the course of the report filed, it states, in no uncertain terms, that the
father made a violent threat to the life of Emily Nieman SW 3 (a demotion?
that’s a good start, I suppose), of CPS.
4. This father has made it quite clear several times, that, regardless of his
current feelings, regardless of how he might have sounded, or how mad, that
every PROMISE made to any member of this court or DHS has ONLY been
about the positions each respective person holds, currently, and that his
promises are to be the cost of continuation in the continued lies told, found
and determined against this father and mother, and the continued and
persistent movement towards the termination of the rights of the parents. At
the most, jail time has been threatened. Never once, during the course of
ANY of these voicemails; can ANYTHING said even be misconstrued of
anything else, let alone the threat of the crime of MURDER. This defendant
also tires greatly of the phrase ‘BORDERLINE THREATS’ being used in
these court documents. It’s never been unclear what I’m promising to anyone,
in ANY recording ever transcribed; or in any blog post currently online. I bring
a challenge to ANYONE in this court or in law enforcement; to find ANY
sentence that threatens ANY bodily harm or felony, even in its intent or
alleged ambiguousness.
5. That, once again, in their desperation to stop this defendant in his actions, as
well as terminate his rights, this agency has filed harassment charges against
the father; concerning these “Borderline threats”; which couldn’t be any less
borderline than they are, currently. They’ve done this before, of course, and
his “Honor” has chosen to skirt the issue, skillfully. Now they’re trying to go all
the way back to July. A true holder to the laws of this state would see this as
completely ridiculous, and would of course wonder why it is that they have
chosen to wait for 7 months to do so. But then we’re hardly dealing with
reasonable fact finders in our case, so it’s no surprise to these parents or the
father that this is even being reasonably considered to be a fact.
6. Iowa Code 708.7 defines harassment (or at least, the type their trying to file
against me anyway) as:
708.7 - Harassment.
1. a. “A person commits harassment when, with intent to intimidate, annoy
or alarm another person, the person does any of the following:
(1) Communicates with another by telephone, writing or via
electronic communication without legitimate purpose and in a
manner likely to cause the other person annoyance or
harm....(the remainder of this does NOT apply)
b. A person commits harassment when the person, purposefully and
without legitimate purpose, has personal contact with another
person, with the intent to threaten, intimidate, or alarm that other
person. As used in this section, unless the context otherwise
requires, “Personal contact” means an encounter in which two or
more people are in visual or physical proximity to each other....(the
remainder to the next section DOES NOT APPLY)
2. a. A person commits harassment in the first degree when the person
commits harassment involving a threat to commit a forcible felony, or
commits harassment and has previously been convicted of
harassment three or more times under this section...(the remainder
does NOT apply here)
3. a. A person commits harassment in the 2nd degree when the person
commits harassment involving a threat to commit bodily injury,
or....(does not apply)
4. a. Any other act of harassment is harassment in the 3rd degree.
b. Harassment in the 3rd degree is a SIMPLE MISDEMEANOR.
7. Concerning portion 1.a.(1), the only portion of this that MAY apply is the
electronic communication portion. I have never spoken to these people voice
to voice with promises like I’ve made, there are only voicemails.
8. Concerning portion 1.b.(1), NONE of this applies at all, since I have never
uttered a threat to anyone in person.
9. Concerning portion 2.a., there are not, in their transcribed words of my
messages, ANY forcible felonies threatened AT ALL.
10. Concerning portion 3.a., there are not, in their transcribed words of my
messages, ANY threats of bodily injury or harm.
11. All throughout this portion of Iowa Code, is the phrase “without legitimate
purpose”. My purpose should be most clear, to warn all employed at DHS
and this court that, if they should continue in the deceit they employ against
these defendants; that their jobs will be taken from them; and nothing more.
This is more than “legitimate purpose”, in this defendant’s opinion anyway;
and would be considered so easily, in Common Law. All I’m doing is
legitimately; and quite possibly; with a bit of brashness and foul language
included for affect; that you may all go to federal prison if you continue in
your actions. I find that to be quite a good enough legitimate purpose for you
folks, if nothing else.
12. Concerning portion 4.a., then, the ONLY possible charge that could be
brought here, is HARASSMENT IN THE 3RD DEGREE; a simple
misdemeanor. This defendant asks, then, as his relief, that this report be re
written or stricken from the court’s records, as the information that is
contained there is UNTRUE AND INCORRECT; as well as damaging to
this defendant, and does, in effect, due to the provided transcripts, bring
against DHS the charge of LIBEL; AND also, asks that any “warrants”
issued because of this, be rescinded immediately. If not, this defendant will
simply add this charge to the growing list of felonious infractions this court
and DHS have already engaged in against the defendants in this case.
`13. Finally, in my statement, let it be known that, regardless of the penalty due
this father, that he is in the process of posting EVERY SINGLE
CONFIDENTIAL COURT DOCUMENT concerning this case, complete
with names and personal information of all connected to it; ON HIS BLOG,
ONLINE, in a logical order and with complete commentary; for this country
to see for eternity, or until the end of the internet’s existence; whichever
comes first. How’s that for “Unresolved Long-standing Mental Issues”? You
haven’t even begun to experience my legal revenge, of this you may be
most certain. Include THAT in your list of “Borderline threats”.
/S/Christopher Bruce
LEGAL father
