 |
| http://pixgood.com/smug.html |
WELCOME AMERICA, TO THE GREATEST THREE RING CIRCUS ON EARTH!! PRICEY'S MAGIC SHOW!!
Oh, this is classic....and noticed....and expected.
ABRAAAAACADABRAAAAA! aaaaaaand....WHALA!! A new trick!!
They’re losing...so this is a desperate time...as well as a desperate measure.
They want to claim that this defendant, as only a married and legal father, is now extra baggage. And has no merit to be here..and should no longer be a party to this action. If it’s found by Pricy boy to be a motion worth granting, and he does so, then every motion I’ve filed, as well as all evidencence for this hearing; is now moot, and removed from this case...imagine that. Wanna bet, that before the god even gets sat down, that this is the first motion that Pricey boy picks up?
Then, Liz is all there is left. She is neglectful, as found by the court, and has done nothing to change it in the time allowed, therefore, the rights are now moved to be terminated. A very very smart move on the part of the Prosecution...just not smart enough. You know what, it’s not a smart move at all. It’s actually an extremely stupid move, a very strange move, a very ironic move...and lastly, a very funny move, all at the same time.
So, let’s go over the facts, shall we?
1. See, first, is the fact that this father has been very much a part of this case for the entire 6 months, and now, alla sudden, he ISN'T??? As a matter of absolute fact, half of the "reasons" they use to originally remove the child concern this father. So if this motion is granted (as we all know full well it will be), it most certainly appears, legally, that this was something that this Judge should have done ages ago, and didn't; mostly because it was an ace he was saving, just when it looks like this defendant might just win his case; and can be easily found to be exactly what it looks like....a move of desperation. Not only that, but should this come down as a ruling of the court, then it has to also be ORDERED. Liz had presented herself as pro se, but there’s also a motion to appoint council to the mother for termination...but then Liz, via me, of course, can ask that lawyer to withdraw, almost immediately as well, and a special hearing for that, must be set. You can’t make someone use an attorney. Hate to tell you folks of the court....(as if you didn't know this); this mother didn't file the financial affidavit so that you could find her indigent and claim her to be in need of another snake...LAWYER, I mean to say lawyer...no, this defendant did so, in order to show any appealing entities that you ASSHOLES and LIARS AND CHEATING BASTARDS did the 2nd one as a way to cut off any chance these defendants had to defend themselves, back in the day. Yet another neat thing about ORDERED? ORDERED means APPEALABLE....So here comes appeal, as well as MANDAMUS...and then trying to get the defendant, the LEGAL FATHER, thrown out of the case? ALSO MOOT.
2. Now, this fact needs a bit of an explanation. I'm sure you’ve seen (and if you haven’t noticed) the report I just filed; where I dispute all this department of state claims as fact over this entire 6 months. In the report, you’ve noticed, I’m sure, that the true father of the child has been found, via a paternity test, to be irrefutibly, the bio father. Even more funny, is that they are claiming, even at this late date, that the father is to be considered for possible placement. Most funny is that Ron Shaver, the bio father, is NOT going to be considered...at all. For one, Ron is too late. For two, Ron has a significant record. For three, Ron Shaver of Newton has been called by these parents with the intention of informing him of DHS’s deceit. Ron, however, has been bull-sh***ed by DHS, and actually believes he has a chance at getting the baby (as a single dad), even though these defendants have told him otherwise, and he has not verified it with us...meaning he has been told, by DHS, not to respond to these parents. For 4, what they have NOT informed Ron Shaver of, is that there’s a new case, filed with a new petition (which by the way, has not, or has of yet, ever been served on these parents; with the sole intention of termination....of not only THESE parent's rights, but of Ron's rights as well.
Why is obvious. There has NEVER....EVER been an intention of reunification....to these defendants, to Felicia Pace (formerly of choice #2 fame, Elizabeth's sister), OR to RON SHAVER....at all. Why? Because this was, as suspected by these parenjts with good reason since day 1, that it wasn’t ever their intention to reunify any part of the family. Their intent was always to milk the money given this state for having this child in the system, then to terminate our rights in order to also make money off of her adoption.
3. Here’s what I’m betting has happened.
The Pritchards were, quite simply, a couple who wanted to adopt a baby...for no reason that we folks will never know...and that’s ok. But, their preference was to have a newborn, instead of the hundreds of children they probably have up for adoption that are 5 or older, as it is for most who want to adopt. Who wants to know that the children they’re adopting used to be very close to their actual parents? And the possibility of almost all older children, as we all know, are almost always damaged or emotionally scarred, and usually have a difficults time adjusting. No, the first choice is usually, for those who want to adopt children; they seem to always PREFER a newborn. Less guilt inolved with that. Makes sense even. The problem is, there’s not too many newborns on the market these days.
So DHS then says...hey, that’s OK...because we can get around this for you. Tell you what, Leslie and Nathan Pritchard of Ankeny.. let’s do this...become foster parents! See, there are new mothers, ones that have just had their children, that often get reported on, and their kids get removed. These kids generally go into the foster care system (or, if we’re really fortunate, we can beat the mothers into giving them up to Safe Haven, our adoption agency first, without consequence), and the parents then jump through our hoops in order to try and get them back...and here’s the best part, most of them fail. What’s more, if they don’t, we could, if properly motivated, SHOW them to fail. Then, because you’ve had her all this time, we can now prove to this court that it’s in the child's best interest (I'm beginning to really hate this phrase) to find permenancy...where she;’s already been all this time; with the fosters. Then, whala, when we terminate their rights, she’s ready for adoption, then ALACAZAM, you’ve received what you wanted....YOUR VERY OWN NEWBORN! I’m betting the Pritchards have no children of their own. Any Takers?? I’ve seen ‘em in court enough..land they never have any other kids with ‘em.
4. I find it ironic that Kevin Brown-L, the D.A. representing, "prays" that the judge will honor and grant this as his relief. I find this to be ironic, because I truly think that this DOG thinks he IS a GOD in our case. This will be shown to be the biggest joke of this decade, all in time.
This marks the 3RD post that I'm continuing. That means that I'm a busy boy, yannow. I mean the hearing's tomorrow...and I have A LOT to do!! I gotta say, the prosecution's keeping me hopping, for sure, for sure. Never fear, we have many surprises. To BE CONTINUED, LIKE PARTS B OF THIS SERIES, AND THE GOING FOR THE B***S POST WITH THE REPORT!! CHECK ON BACK, YA HEAR???
