It simply amazes me the things these people will try while I float blithely along...While I was diddling around congratulating myself and slapping myself on the back, saying victory is assured...the other side, true to their nature has been speeding along, and still trying their little tricks to terminate before these defendants know what hit 'em.
They will of course, fail miserably, though it seems they know it not...which they very well DO know...but, think I may have not, as yet, caught on to what I have to do....I have. And did. And have done. For the information of my followers and readers, all I have wanted to do has been, as of this date, done. HOWEVER....
They did, but only a little, spoil my fun. I had such big plans to make this a circus they wouldn't soon forget. In all of this, I only got to serve 1....count'em, 1 subpoena...and that sucks. Worse yet, you might have thought it would be the one I wanted to serve the most, at the very least...and there is a good excuse fot my actions. I forgot today was Saturday.
I didn't realize that the day I knew to be my last to serve was on a Saturday. DAMN.
However, there is a shiny little lining that they will, STILL...BE UPSET WITH. And it is now located, right where it should have been last night...as well as right here, in this post. Well, you know, I really do have to get it out, ya know, because this one is the one that matters, the one they've been trying to beat me filing, and didn't. WORSE YET, they've already drawn up the petition for termination, and started the action. I like that the first motions in it were MINE...and the end to all of their actions henceforth...
Here is the expected motion from last night, to be immediately followed by the one that will lay Judge Price and the gang to their final resting place. The first is too late now, it won't affect anything...not that it would have anyway. For those of you that are lost, NOTHING I would have done or said would have stopped, slowed down or eliminated the termination train that was moving ahead at 190 MPH...except the one following this one. The one thing that would have gotten me out of the way was termination. I have, with one motion, terminated their termination. Bye Bye guys!!!! For you readers, you're gonna wanna see the 2nd motion. These guys don't even have to look....'cause they knew it was coming, as soon as I posted Mr. DHS Directtor's letter. Now, I shouldn't hear a peep from the other side...albeit I've been wrong before...
***********************************************************************************************************
Here is the first of two, filed on our CURRENT case...
My wife and I would like to get visitation, as ordered by the court, with our daughter, Trilynn Brueggeman, and with permission from FSRP and DHS, 7 days a week, unsupervised in our home; from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. every evening.
/S/ Christopher Bruce and Elizabeth Bruce
CHRISTOPHER BRUCE AND ELIZABETH BRUCE
Now, you and I both know that the judge, even at his weakest, would never grant such a motion...but we should have filed this document oh.....5 days up to 2 days ago...this would have prevented this from showing up....today.
NEW CASE: INVOLUNTARY TERMINATION OF PARENTAL RIGHTS.
Now they're trying to say, because I (allegedly, but did NOT) said that I wanted no more contact with DHS...to wit, in their report, they're saying I said I wanted NO MORE CONTACT, so they haven't. What I said was, WE'RE DONE. In their usual fashion, they interpreted it for me again.
However, nothing they've ever said or done to these defendants is now going to matter any more. What am I talking about? Well, remember the recorded interaction of the removal? We didn't realize itl...again, because I could barely stand to listen to ALL of it, that Ms. Bitch Nieman asked the mother if she was Indian. She said yes, and Ms. Nieman said "What tribe are you?' Then after her pause (because she wasn't quite suire) Ms. Bitch said "Nevermind"....then marked, both on the legal order, AND on the separate paperwork that she said NO...Nice huh?
Here's why she said NO.
Now, because of THIS motion, all they've said and done? GONE!
Judge Price? GONE. All the other bitches, who are all gonna lose thier jobs? GONE. I wouldn't be surprised if Ms. Nieman wasn't already GONE. I'm already looking for her to tell her how I feel about the crimes she commited, before those charges are brought on her, and I can watch the FEDS lock her up for...Oh, LIFEMAYBE?? That'll be a real tootin' PLEASURE BABY.
bye bye!!
Here's that motion I've been sayin' gonna put this case right on out of this Honor's hands....for GOOD. I'll be sure and show up for court in order to express my condolences for their loss....LOL.
**************************************************************************************************
By the by, here's another motion I just can't help but share with you BEFORE the winner.
1. That this court, in its efforts to thwart these defendants, did, with malice, start a new case on Saturday, January 10th, 2015. This was an effort to terminate their rights while they waited for the permanency hearing, or quite possibly directly following it, or before these defendants could file an appeal, as well as the promised writ of Mondamus.
2. That this court did, in its efforts to thwart these defendants, changed the service list to include the father, Ron Shaver, who these defendants do not know, let alone know the email address of.
3. That this court did, in its efforts to thwart these defendants, changed the service list to include our child, Trilynn Brueggeman, who, in the best knowledge of these defendants, is 5 1/2 months old, and isn’t even cognizant enough to have an email address, let alone should these defendants be required to email court documents to this child’s account, should she even have one.
4. This is another attempt by this court to trip up these defendants, in order to distract them from doing what they were, AND HAVE already done. We have, in accordance with the law, unlike all in this court, filed for the intervention of the ICWA act, a right that was dismissed and bypassed by Emily Nieman, SW4, who will be answering for her crimes soon enough. We further bring that we have, indeed, not only done it in THIS case, but in the other as well.
5. That Judge Price is only adding to his list, where his acts of deceit and bias are concerned, and will answer to these charges soon enough.
6. These defendants, in order to comply with this court, hereby request these “email addresses”, or these new service’s physical addresses immediately, in order to forward our motions in this case; and comply with procedure. If this court is not willing to do so, we will appeal all cases to the supreme court, post-haste, to see how they feel about it, as soon as we walk out the door to this hearing, upcoming, as well as to stall further proceedings, in order to give ALL appropriate government officials and agencies (on the FEDERAL level and the intervention of the Cherokee tribe more than enough time to act). We have also informed the FBI of your actions, numerous times. Expect ACTION on ALL CRIMES on ALL PARTIES on the opposing side of this court, and their affiliates, A.S.A.P. Also included in these actions will be the Director of DHS, and the Governor, Terry J. Branstad.
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaand....
COMES NOW ......the winner!!
***********************************************************************************************************
COMES NOW Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce in their motion to expedite the request for an order setting hearing for the applicability of ICWA:
1. Tyilynn Brueggeman, the child in interest, is part Indian. A hearing must be scheduled to protect her rights with proper notice to the parties.
2. The Court must set an expedited hearing to determine the applicability of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. Sections 1901-1963, concerning the child in interest.
3. The court must assign a new Guardian Ad Litem to meet the needs of the child, who is part Indian.
4. The court must assign a new court appointed attorney to represent the mother at states expense. The court has previously determined that the mother, Elizabeth Bruce, cannot pay any part of the expenses of counsel.
5. Judge Price must recuse himself from this matter because he has shown bias and prejudice.
6. Courts have repeatedly held … the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a).
7. In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated
"Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function --- thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted."
8. "Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so
that the judicial machinery cannot perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication." Kenner v. C.I.R., 387F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore's Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated "a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final."
9. Reasonable efforts have not been made by the DHS.
10. Under Iowa Code § 232.96(8), the court may dismiss the petition.
11. Clerk to provide a copy of the order to child, parents, counsel of record, foster parents, Iowa Department of Human Services, Indian Tribe, Secretary of the Interior, and case scheduler.
WHEREFORE Christopher and Elizabeth Bruce requests an expedited hearing date and time to determine the applicability of the Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. Sections 1901-1963, concerning the child in interest.
OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE the court shall order the release of the child, Tyilynn Brueggeman, if the court finds that there is not probable cause to believe that the child is a child within the jurisdiction of the court.
********************************************************************************************
Isn't this the SH**?? DAMN I'd just LOVE to see their faces tomorrow morning...(whisltes a little tune and promptly skips off to enjoy his day)
********************************************************************************************
Isn't this the SH**?? DAMN I'd just LOVE to see their faces tomorrow morning...(whisltes a little tune and promptly skips off to enjoy his day)
